Caphrim007 and I were talking the other day, and we decided, to better fit in, to consider talking in parables. However, parable may not be the correct term, since while most of what we say does have a moral, it usually not spiritual in nature, and certainly oftain contains talking animals, plants and inanimate objects. I guess we should use metaphors instead. This way, maybe people will understand us better, and we should better fit in ‘inner circles’.

So, if you teach a man to fish, he will get eaten by a shark. The shark will free the tuna in a net, thus a bird will fall from a wire.

What is one without one? It is for naught. But without one, naught cannot exist.

Blue will provide the light, but beware the shade. Colorless is nothing and everything, while colorful is lacking.

wrt the orthogonal symmetry is conducive parallel of the walltime docet to reach a state of an art herein a SLA of utmost importance of SOA to do their modular exposed diligence since harm rolls down hill before a prior.